Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chayenne Ewijk vs Emily Seibold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ewijk vs Seibold analysis and find out who is favored!
Chayenne Ewijk vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ewijk 1 - 0 Seibold
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ewijk has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Seibold has won 44.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ewijk, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 60.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ewijk has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 60.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ewijk has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Seibold winning 43.75% (W/L 14/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ewijk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 110/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 14/ 9). Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ewijk winning 1 times and Seibold being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ewijk winning 2 and Seibold winning 0. The last match between Ewijk and Seibold was at the Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, 16-08-2017, Second, Clay with Chayenne Ewijk getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ewijk and Seibold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ewijk winning 0 times and Seibold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ewijk winning 1, and Seibold 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ewijk has played against opponents with an average rank of while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 216.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ewijk has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ewijk has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 49.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
229
High
35
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
824
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
64% (183-102)
Career Total W/L
53% (147-129)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chayenne Ewijk | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chayenne Ewijk | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (26/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (205/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 154.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (737/1184) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (471/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (201/447) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (88/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (612/1263) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Chayenne Ewijk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Sviatlana Pirazhenka
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Eleonora Molinaro
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Xenia Knoll
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Deborah Kerfs
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
98)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
114
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Cindy Castille
49%
(
48 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
9
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
10
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Meritxell Perera Ros
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
12
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Ioana Gheorghita
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Dalila Spiteri
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
88%
(
38 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Deborah Kerfs
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Selina Dal
Player
Emily Seibold
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Emily Seibold
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ewijk Vs Seibold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
